in Stamford, Conn., has put a lot of thought into network security. Worst practices for network securityĪndrew Lerner, an analyst with Gartner Inc. To avoid some of these problems, Conde recommends SaaS cloud-hosted versions that may offer better support.ĭiscover more of Conde's thoughts on network automation. Similarly, while some products such as ElasticSearch have horizontally scaling features, many systems lack easy large-scale deployment, and may not offer support given their open-source features. Nonetheless, Conde writes that enterprises may struggle with integrating some of these tools. Stone stressed the growing stability of automation tools, such as git, which have become virtually mainstream. While Conde emphasizes the process and potential benefits of network automation, he also spells out potential concerns facing enterprises.
PACKET CAPTURE CODE
Stone indicated that code management tends to follow a multi-step cycle, encompassing everything from building, testing and validating to deploying, monitoring and revising. There, Matt Stone, a speaker with Brocade, discussed infrastructure management and best practices for a network automation system. in Milford, Mass., recently attended the Network Automation Meetup in San Francisco. Supporting network automationĭrew Conde, an analyst with Enterprise Strategy Group Inc. Read more about Greer's thoughts on packet capture appliance use. If a link goes above 5% utilization, Greer recommends using a purpose-built packet capture appliance.
PACKET CAPTURE FULL
According to Greer, he has never seen a laptop support full packet capture even at 1 Mbps.
Examining the results, Greer said his laptop wasn't able to keep up with 1 GB traffic, and it couldn't also determine when standard packet transmission spacing fell below specs. All told, 18,000 packets out of the 100,000 packets sent were actually captured by the Wireshark installation on the laptop, in contrast with almost 100% of packets captured by the appliance.
0 kommentar(er)
